Hegel's philosophy of nature and of man is a speculative metaphysics of nature. In this period a metaphysical conception of nature had first been developed in. In Hegel's view, therefore, the proper stance to adopt towards ethical institutions is that of trust; moreover, there is a distinctive freedom to be found in trust itself. This chapter discusses Hegel's conception of Begriffsbestimmung and his philosophy of science. One of the difficulties that confronts the modern philosopher of.
Hegel’s Philosophical Understanding of IllnessIn Hegel's view, therefore, the proper stance to adopt towards ethical institutions is that of trust; moreover, there is a distinctive freedom to be found in trust itself. Abstract. Hegels famous statement in the preface of his Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, that. "philosophy is its own time apprehended in thoughts," has given occasion for several. historist interpretations proposing that he renders his own theorising as historically. While we are building a new and improved webshop, please click below to purchase this content via our partner CCC and their Rightfind service. You will need to.
Hegel Philosophy General considerations VideoPHILOSOPHY - Hegel Hegelianism, the collection of philosophical movements that developed out of the thought of the 19th-century German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich mindspic.com term is here so construed as to exclude Hegel himself and to include, therefore, only the ensuing Hegelian movements. As such, its thought is focused upon history and logic, a history in which it sees, in various perspectives, that. In fact Bertrand Russell had, at points in his career, Cinemaxx Offenbach such an idea of propositional content itself. The Philosophy of Hegel. From the perspective of consciousness history is something that stands over against me qua something known, but from the standpoint of self -consciousness I grasp this history as Filme 1930 history of that which contributes to mequa rational and free being.
He has to show that reason can develop on its own, and does not need us to do the developing for it at least for those things in the world that are not human-created.
As we saw cf. Thus reason, as it were, drives itself, and hence does not need our heads to develop it. Ironically, Hegel derives the basic outlines of his account of self-driving reason from Kant.
Kant divided human rationality into two faculties: the faculty of the understanding and the faculty of reason. The understanding uses concepts to organize and regularize our experiences of the world.
Reason coordinates the concepts of the understanding by following out necessary chains of syllogisms to produce concepts that achieve higher and higher levels of conceptual unity.
Indeed, this process will lead reason to produce its own transcendental ideas, or concepts that go beyond the world of experience.
In the end, Kant thought, reason will follow out such chains of syllogisms until it develops completely comprehensive or unconditioned universals—universals that contain all of the conditions or all of the less-comprehensive concepts that help to define them.
Once reason has generated the unconditioned concept of the whole world, for instance, Kant argued, it can look at the world in two, contradictory ways.
In the first antinomy, reason can see the world 1 as the whole totality or as the unconditioned, or 2 as the series of syllogisms that led up to that totality.
If reason sees the world as the unconditioned or as a complete whole that is not conditioned by anything else, then it will see the world as having a beginning and end in terms of space and time, and so will conclude the thesis that the world has a beginning and end or limit.
But if reason sees the world as the series, in which each member of the series is conditioned by the previous member, then the world will appear to be without a beginning and infinite, and reason will conclude the antithesis that the world does not have a limit in terms of space and time cf.
Reason thus leads to a contradiction: it holds both that the world has a limit and that it does not have a limit at the same time.
Kant was right that reason speculatively generates concepts on its own, and that this speculative process is driven by necessity and leads to concepts of increasing universality or comprehensiveness.
Kant was even right to suggest—as he had shown in the discussion of the antinomies—that reason is dialectical, or necessarily produces contradictions on its own.
The fact that reason develops those contradictions on its own, without our heads to help it , shows that those contradictions are not just in our heads, but are objective, or in the world itself.
SL-dG 35 , or to the nature of concepts themselves. Fichte argued that the task of discovering the foundation of all human knowledge leads to a contradiction or opposition between the self and the not-self it is not important, for our purposes, why Fichte held this view.
The kind of reasoning that leads to this contradiction, Fichte said, is the analytical or antithetical method of reasoning, which involves drawing out an opposition between elements in this case, the self and not-self that are being compared to, or equated with, one another.
While the traditional reductio ad absurdum argument would lead us to reject both sides of the contradiction and start from scratch, Fichte argued that the contradiction or opposition between the self and not-self can be resolved.
In particular, the contradiction is resolved by positing a third concept—the concept of divisibility—which unites the two sides The Science of Knowledge , I: —11; Fichte — Indeed, Fichte argued, not only is the move to resolve contradictions with synthetic concepts or judgments possible, it is necessary.
As he says of the move from the contradiction between self and not-self to the synthetic concept of divisibility,. The Science of Knowledge , I: ; Fichte Without the synthetic concepts or judgments, we are left, as the classic reductio ad absurdum argument suggests, with nothing at all.
The synthetic concepts or judgments are thus necessary to get beyond contradiction without leaving us with nothing. Fichte suggested that a synthetic concept that unifies the results of a dialectically-generated contradiction does not completely cancel the contradictory sides, but only limits them.
Instead of concluding, as a reductio ad absurdum requires, that the two sides of a contradiction must be dismissed altogether, the synthetic concept or judgment retroactively justifies the opposing sides by demonstrating their limit, by showing which part of reality they attach to and which they do not The Science of Knowledge , I: —10; Fichte —9 , or by determining in what respect and to what degree they are each true.
For Hegel, as we saw cf. From the point of view of the later concepts or forms, the earlier ones still have some validity, that is, they have a limited validity or truth defined by the higher-level concept or form.
Ultimately, Hegel thought, as we saw cf. Some of their skepticism grows out of the role that contradiction plays in his thought and argument.
While many of the oppositions embedded in the dialectical development and the definitions of concepts or forms are not contradictions in the strict sense, as we saw section 2 , above , scholars such as Graham Priest have suggested that some of them arguably are Priest Hegel even holds, against Kant cf.
As he describes it:. Something moves, not because now it is here and there at another now, but because in one and the same now it is here and not here, because in this here, it is and is not at the same time.
SL-dG ; cf. Priest ; Düsing 97— Karl R. Being is an undefined content, taken to mean being or presence, while Nothing is an undefined content, taken to mean nothing or absence section 2 , above; cf.
Wandschneider 34— Being is Nothing or non-being with respect to the property they have as concepts, namely, that they both have an undefined content.
But Being is not Nothing or non-being with respect to their meaning Wandschneider 34— It is therefore only an apparent contradiction.
A dialectical contradiction, Inoue says, is a contradiction that arises when the same topic is considered from different vantage points, but each vantage point by itself does not violate the law of non-contradiction Inoue The understanding leads to contradictions, as Hegel said cf.
The geocentric theory that the sun revolves around the Earth and the heliocentric theory that the Earth revolves around the sun, for instance, Inoue suggests, are both correct from certain points of view.
We live our everyday lives from a vantage point in which the sun makes a periodic rotation around the Earth roughly every 24 hours.
Astronomers make their observations from a geocentric point of view and then translate those observations into a heliocentric one.
From these points of view, the geocentric account is not incorrect. But physics, particularly in its concepts of mass and force, requires the heliocentric account.
For science—which takes all these points of view into consideration—both theories are valid: they are dialectically contradictory, though neither theory, by itself, violates the law of non-contradiction Inoue — To insist that the Earth really revolves around the sun is merely an irrational, reductive prejudice, theoretically and practically Inoue Priest ; [ 4].
The acceptance of some contradictions, he has suggested, does not require the acceptance of all contradictions Priest Contradictions lead logically to any claim whatsoever, as Popper said, only if we presuppose that nothing can be both true and false at the same time i.
Other principles or criteria—such as being strongly disproved or supported by the data—are more important for determining whether a claim or inference is rational Priest [ ].
SL-M ; Priest , — Hegel is right, for instance, Priest argues, that change, and motion in particular, are examples of real or existing contradictions Priest ; —97; [ —, —15].
What distinguishes motion, as a process, from a situation in which something is simply here at one time and then some other place at some other time is the embodiment of contradiction: that, in a process of motion, there is one span of time in which something is both here and not here at the same time in that span of time Priest —; [ —, —].
A system of logic, Priest suggests, is always just a theory about what good reasoning should be like Priest Inoue —].
For more on dialetheic logic generally, see the entry on Dialetheism. These interpreters reject the idea that there is any logical necessity to the moves from stage to stage.
Solomon writes, for instance,. The connections are anything but entailments, and the Phenomenology could always take another route and other starting points.
Solomon A transcendental argument begins with uncontroversial facts of experience and tries to show that other conditions must be present—or are necessary—for those facts to be possible.
Taylor 97, —7; for a critique of this view, see Pinkard 7, In his examination of the epistemological theory of the Phenomenology , for instance, Kenneth R.
Ermanno Bencivenga offers an interpretation that combines a narrative approach with a concept of necessity. Berto ; Maybee xx—xxv; Margolis — While some of the moves from stage to stage are driven by syntactic necessity, other moves are driven by the meanings of the concepts in play.
A logic that deals only with the forms of logical arguments and not the meanings of the concepts used in those argument forms will do no better in terms of preserving truth than the old joke about computer programs suggests: garbage in, garbage out.
But if we plug in something for those terms that is untrue or meaningless garbage in , then the syntax of formal logic will lead to an untrue or meaningless conclusion garbage out.
Against these sorts of logics, Hegel wanted to develop a logic that not only preserved truth, but also determined how to construct truthful claims in the first place.
A logic that defines concepts semantics as well as their relationships with one another syntax will show, Hegel thought, how concepts can be combined into meaningful forms.
Maybee xvii—xxv. In the Phenomenology , for instance, the moves are driven by syntax, semantics, and by phenomenological factors.
Sometimes a move from one stage to the next is driven by a syntactic need—the need to stop an endless, back-and-forth process, for instance, or to take a new path after all the current options have been exhausted cf.
And sometimes a move is driven by a phenomenological need or necessity—by requirements of consciousness , or by the fact that the Phenomenology is about a consciousness that claims to be aware of or to know something.
The man is, indeed, fundamentally, a desire denier: it tends toward a goal or object and it tries to assimilate, to deny them, as their own for example, food is absorbed by the subject.
Only shows Hegel, desire is the desire of my generator. Beyond the training of the individual self is in Work and into history as the negation is expressed with full power edifying.
History, too understood as the development of the Idea and spiritual process total , fully reveals man who is part of negativity in it: it is becoming where the man denies the world and externalizing and freedom.
Far from designating an organization relative and contingent, it is the social substance came to full consciousness of itself.
History does not, in Hegel, a narrow sense, but it means a comprehensive and universal. The Universal History is nothing but the manifestation of the divine process of absolute Spirit, the gradual progress by which it becomes aware of itself.
The final stages of total spiritual process correspond to those of Art, Religion and Philosophy: the movement of the Spirit acquires a transparency of greater and greater.
The idea, conceived as a higher form of the Spirit, fully actualized in the artwork and the Beautiful. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Chapter X. Krug", Kritisches Journal der Philosophie , I, no. Museum Tusculanum Press. Vickroy and Susan E. Blow—who were both minor associates of the St.
Louis Hegelians—independently of each other translated various chapters from Göschel's book into English, and had their translations published in The Journal of Speculative Philosophy.
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy in print from — was the official journal of the St. Louis Philosophical Society. The St. Louis Philosophical Society—the organization which served as the hub of the St.
Louis Hegelians—had been co-founded in January by 2 disciples of Hegel in America, William Torrey Harris — and Henry Conrad Brokmeyer — Thomas Rhys Vickroy — , a minister of the Methodist Episcopal Church, had been the first president — of Lebanon Valley College in Annville, Lebanon County, Pennsylvania.
While President at Lebanon Valley College, Vickroy also held various professorships there. For example, one year he was Professor of Philosophy and the Greek Language and Literature, and another year he was Professor of Belles-Lettres and Philosophy.
Susan Elizabeth Blow — was an educator who in opened the first successful public kindergarten in the U. Louis, Missouri.
Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion. Speirs and J. Burdon Sanderson as Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion , New York: Humanities Press, The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hegel — A Biography. United States: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufmann , Discovery of the Mind 1: Goethe, Kant and Hegel , p. George di Giovanni. Kaufmann , Hegel: A Reinterpretation , Anchor, p. Kaufmann, , Hegel: A Reinterpretation , p.
Green, New York: Columbia University Press, Mueller Jon Stewart ed. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Northwestern University Press.
The Freudian Left: Wilhelm Reich, Geza Roheim, Herbert Marcuse. Francis Fukuyama and the End of History.
University of Wales Press. Russell, History of Western Philosophy , chapter 22, paragraph 1, p. Author's preface to "On The Fourfold Root of the Principle of sufficient reason.
A History of Western Philosophy. The Open Society And Its Enemies. Fraser, F. Muller eds. Instead, I argue that we must understand Hegel as a Hermetic thinker, if we are to truly understand him at all.
Adcock, Robert Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale. Oxford University Press. Beiser, Frederick C.
New York: Routledge. Burbidge, John, The Logic of Hegel's Logic: An Introduction. Broadview Press. Hegel: A Re-examination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Between Transcendence and Historicism: The Ethical Nature of the Arts in Hegelian Aesthetics. SUNY Press. Francke, Kuno, Howard, William Guild, Schiller, Friedrich, — The German classics of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: masterpieces of German literature translated into English Vol 7, Jay Lowenberg, The Life of Georg Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel.
Retrieved 24 September Gentile, Andrea, Bewusstsein, Anschauung und das Unendliche bei Fichte, Schelling und Hegel. Stanford University Press.
Harris, H. Hegel: Phenomenology and System. Indianapolis: Hackett. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Houlgate, Stephen, An Introduction to Hegel.
Freedom, Truth and History. Oxford: Blackwell Houlgate, Stephen, The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. Purdue University Press.
Paris: Aubier. Samuel Cherniak and John Heckman as Genesis and Structure of Hegel's "Phenomenology of Spirit" , Evanston: Northwestern University Press, Inwood, M.
Hegel—The Arguments of the Philosophers. Athens: Ohio University Press. Kaufmann, Walter , Hegel: A Reinterpretation.
New York: Doubleday reissued Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press, Paris: Gallimard. James H. Nichols, Jr. Kreines, James Reason in the World: Hegel's Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal.
Lom, Petr The Limits of Doubt: The Moral and Political Implications of Skepticism. Losurdo, Domenico , Hegel and the Freedom of Moderns.
Der junge Hegel. Zürich and Vienna 2nd ed. Berlin, Rodney Livingstone as The Young Hegel , London: Merlin Press, Maker, William, Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel.
State University of New York Press. Luther, Timothy C. Hegel's Critique of Modernity: Reconciling Individual Freedom and the Community.
MacGregor, David Hegel and Marx: After the Fall of Communism. Marcuse, Herbert , Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory.
Mueller, Gustav Emil , Hegel: the man, his vision, and work. New York: Pageant Press. Ng, Karen Hegel's Concept of Life: Self-Consciousness, Freedom, Logic.
Retrieved 24 December Pinkard, Terry , Hegel's Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Temple University Press Pinkard, Terry , Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason.
Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Pippin, Robert B. Hegel's Idealism: the Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness.
Plant, Raymond , Hegel: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Quinton, Anthony In Kenny, Kenny ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Most reference books say that Hegel died of cholera. There was an epidemic of it and Hegel was worried about being infected.
But Hegel's most recent biographer Terry Pinkard argues conclusively that it was not cholera that killed Hegel. He had no diarrhoea and no swelling.
It was probably, Pinkard says, 'some kind of upper gastro-intestinal disease'. This detail is characteristic of the immense thoroughness and pertinacity of Pinkard's 'Hegel, a Biography' C.
Riedel, Manfred , Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy , Cambridge. Rockmore, Tom Before and After Hegel: A Historical Introduction to Hegel's Thought.
Hegel follows Kant In short, he adopts a view very similar to Kant's empirical realism. Rose, Gillian , Hegel Contra Sociology.
Athlone Press. Rosen, Stanley, F Hegel: Introduction To Science Of Wisdom , Carthage Reprint St. Reading Hegel's Phenomenology.
Indiana University Press. Rutter, Benjamin , Hegel on the Modern Arts , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Sarlemijn, Andries Hegel's Dialectic.
Reidel Publishing Company. Singer, Peter , Hegel: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press previously issued in the OUP Past Masters series, Solomon, Robert, In the Spirit of Hegel , Oxford: Oxford University Press Stern, Robert Abingdon, Oxon New York: Routledge.
Stewart, Jon, ed. The Philosophy of Hegel. New York: Dover. Taylor, Charles , Williams, Robert R. Articles related to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
Continental philosophy. Theodor W. Absurdism Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Frankfurt School German idealism Hegelianism Hermeneutics Marxism Neo-Kantianism New Philosophers Non-philosophy Phenomenology Postmodernism Post-structuralism Psychoanalytic theory Romanticism Social constructionism Speculative realism Structuralism Western Marxism.
In the second phase — , in which Hegelianism diffused into other countries, the works of the centre played a preponderant role; thus, in this phase of the history of the interpretation of Hegel, usually called Neo-Hegelian, the primary interest was in logic and a reform of the dialectic.
In the fourth stage, after World War II , the revival of Marxist studies in Europe finally thrust into the foreground the interest in the relation between Hegel and Karl Marx and in the value of the Hegelian heritage for Marxism , with particular regard to political and social problems.
This fourth phase of the history of Hegelianism thus appropriated many of the polemical themes of the earlier years of the school. Hegelianism Article Media Additional Info.
Article Contents. Print print Print. Table Of Contents. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.
Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.